Meta — Community Standards Enforcement Report
Meta's flagship voluntary transparency report — how much violating content it actioned on Facebook and Instagram across ~16 policy areas, quarterly since 2017 Q4. Unlike the DSA or Türkiye Law 5651 reports, the CSER isn't filed under any single law; Meta publishes it of its own accord (now under the "Integrity Reports" umbrella). Headline metrics: prevalence (how often violating content is seen), content actioned and removed, the proactive rate (share caught before a user reported it), and appeals / restores. A tidy-long dataset: each row is one measured value identified by app × policy area × metric × quarter. Prevalence and rates are percentages (never summed); Cross-Policy Data is an across-policy aggregate, so it's excluded from the per-policy breakdowns below.
Trends
Interactive views of the reported figures. Each chart has a text alternative for screen readers.
Prevalence over time (Facebook)
Upper-bound prevalence — the estimated share of views that were of violating content — each quarter, one line per policy area (the five Meta reports prevalence for). A percentage; lower is better.
Content actioned by policy area (latest quarter, Facebook)
Pieces of content Meta took action on in the most recent quarter, by policy area.
Proactive rate by policy area (latest quarter, Facebook)
The share of actioned content Meta found itself before anyone reported it, by policy area. A percentage.
Prevalence range by policy area (latest quarter, Facebook)
Meta reports prevalence as a lower–upper bound. Percentages, not counts — don't sum them.
What the report covers
The number of reported values per metric across the whole dataset. Counts of rows, not summed quantities.
Refine or extend these in the query builder (pin a metric before aggregating), browse the full field list on the Schema page, or read the Methodology.